From the weekend after First Holy Communion in the parish . . .
+++++
Celebrating
the sacraments with children and young people is always an event accompanied by
joy for me. It is beautiful to witness
them encounter the Lord in such powerful ways.
A particular joy is seeing the happiness and reverence with which
children receive their First Holy Communion.
You can tell that they are really trying to do it correctly. I think that we can all learn something from
that experience.
Those
receiving First Holy communion must learn how they ought to receive the
Eucharist. The Church instructs us that
there are two methods available to us.
The most common is reception of Holy Communion on the hand. This option, while ancient in origin, was not
practiced in the Church for centuries.
It was restored following the Second Vatican Council. When receiving the Eucharist on the hand, we
are instructed to place one hand beneath the other and cup the uppermost hand
slightly so as to fashion a sort of throne upon which the priest or
extraordinary minister of Holy Communion may place the host. The priest is instructed to say, “The Body of
Christ,” while the recipient is instructed to respond, “Amen.” After the host is placed on the hand, the
recipient uses the fingers of his bottom hand to gently grasp the host and
place it in his mouth for consumption.
He does not plop it into his mouth as though he were swallowing an
aspirin. Afterwards, the recipient
should examine his hands to ensure that no fragments of the consecrated host
remain. If there are fragments, these
should also be collected and consumed.
It is gravely irreverent to shake or wipe these fragments onto the
floor.
If a person
is unable to receive Holy Communion in the manner described above, his other
option is to receive the host directly on the tongue. This practice is also of ancient origin, and
was instituted so as prevent any sacrilege against the Eucharist from
occurring. In this practice, one
approaches the priest or extraordinary minister of Holy Communion in the usual
manner, and after responding “Amen,” opens his mouth and extends his tongue
slightly so that the consecrated host may be placed directly on the
tongue.
While Mother
Church expresses no preference for either of these options, it should be noted
that these are the only options. If one is unable to receive the Eucharist
with both hands, as, for instance, when carrying a child, one should receive
directly on the tongue. Likewise, if one
cannot use his bottom hand to transfer the consecrated host from his hand to
his mouth, he should also opt to receive on the tongue.
Again, the
Church does not express a preference for either option. I would simply note that prior to my
ordination, I chose to receive on the tongue.
I did this for several reasons: There were no fragments left in my
hand. It required humility of me to
allow a priest to place the Consecrated Host on my tongue. It ensured that I would not be responsible
for accidentally dropping Our Lord’s Sacred Body. While it is a practice that was awkward for
me at first, I found it to be deeply spiritually fruitful after time.
In either
case, this point should be remembered.
When approaching the altar for Holy Communion, we always receive. We do not
dare to take the Eucharist. It is something given to us. We do not grasp it from Him. We must never presume to grab the host from
the person distributing it. Following
the example of our new communicants, perhaps we can all be a bit more observant
in trying to receive the Eucharist more reverently and properly.
I also find that allowing the priest to place it on my tongue is humbling and tends to remind me of sacrifice given not just for me but me as well.
ReplyDeleteTate